The Chief Law Officer of New York City, Letitia James, and the state’s commissioner of education, Betty Rosa, launched a joint assistance declaration this month, cautioning schools that it would be prohibited to prohibit inappropriate sexual material.
In the August 9 assistance, the 2 state authorities tell school districts that they can not utilize “a pretext of inappropriateness or lewdness to systemically eliminate diverse viewpoints from the classroom” since it violates the New york city State Human Rights Law (NYSHR).
The assistance recommends that the radical gay program is approved by state law and warns versus “Forbiding conversations related to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, nonbinary and gender expansive individuals, or varied family structures and identities utilizing a pretext of inappropriateness or profanity.”
Letitia James, the AG of New York, and Dr. Betty Rosa, the commissioner of education, have actually just released guidance on August 9th, 2023 that explicitly threaten schools in New York that if they restrict curriculum under the “pretext” of lewdness, inappropriateness, or … pic.twitter.com/1WaLpwTX77
— Right Side of History ™ (@xxclusionary) August 20, 2023
The guidance seems to state that school district officials can not remove porn or specific sexual products from schools if the subject proclaims the severe LGBTQ program. This guidance opens school kids of any ages to be subjected to hardcore gay sexual material as a matter of state law.
Indeed, this assistance can be stated to be mandating that the youngest of school kids ought to be exposed to such adult material.
The guidance also keeps in mind that banning transgender “ladies” from sports or from using the women’ restroom and locker room centers is illegal, saying it protests the law to “Restrict a person from participating in a specific extracurricular program or utilizing a specific center since they do not adhere to gender stereotypes.”
Along those same lines, the assistance includes that “Prohibiting a transgender, gender extensive, or nonbinary individual from using the single-gender extracurricular program or facility most closely lined up with their gender identity” is likewise illegal.
The two state officials even declare that it is illegal to require transgender individuals to provide evidence from a doctor that they are legitimately being treated for gender problems.
Schools are disallowed from “Requiring a gender extensive or non-binary individual to supply identification or evidence of their gender in order to access the proper single-gender extracurricular program or facility,” the assistance firmly insisted.
Finally, the guidance likewise dismisses the issues of biological ladies who may be stressed that they will be forced to undress and use centers in which males might be seen walking nude or in various states of undress.
Schools are prohibited from “Barring a gender expansive trainee from a single-gender extracurricular program out of concern that they will make other trainees unpleasant,” the file states.
Eventually, the assistance alerts instructors, staffers, and school district workers that they need to “affirm” a trainee’s claims to being transgender, gay, or a member of any of the “protected classes.”
The guidance concludes:
Failure to effectively address instances and patterns of harassment versus students based upon secured classes or a school environment that ends up being hostile towards a protected class might violate state, federal, or local law.32 Additional, denying equivalent access to student groups that affirm trainee identities or address bias related to these identities might also violate federal law.33 Educators and other school staff who connect with students and verify trainees’ identities, consisting of racial and ethnic identities, gender and gender expressions, and lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual identities play an essential role in promoting school belonging and helping students feel welcome.34 If instructors or other school personnel know of discrimination in their school or school district based upon a protected class, they may report such discrimination to their manager or to companies charged with treating that discrimination. Press reporters might receive protection from retaliation based upon applicable law.
If Letitia James and Betty Rosa are correct in their proclamations, New York State law now preserves transgenderism as a “safeguarded class” without any proof and no physician’s accreditation and needs that everyone else bow to the transgender agenda.