I will begin this article with an apology to those readers who do not have a ense of humour similar to mine, as well as to those lovely huge hearted folks who do not like labeling of any sort (sheep and/or shrew).
Relating to the term “sheep”– I have tried (and am certain I have stopped working sometimes) to avoid calling a specific person as “sheep.” It is rather a term I have used to a group of people with a comparable “mindset.” If you feel you fit that state of mind, you may, if you want, call yourself a “sheep.” If you discover it offending, and do not feel you “fit,” then that is great by me. Do not include yourself in the sheep group.
As for shrews. Well, that’s where the sense of humour comes in. I needed a term aside from “those of us on the other side of the divide who believe in freedom and do not think in the program or the power starving globalists attempting to take over the world”… whew …”shrew” is a much easier way to get the very same point throughout when the term is defined.
Why shrew? That’s a long story. However it is a term as great as any, and is complimentary to “sheep” as it starts with the exact same first two letters, and it too is an animal. Ends up shrews can be ferocious, although really little. So that fits too.
So there you have it. Read this article with these things in mind, as it has lots of referral to sheep and shrew.
The deadly mistake of sheep is not understanding that individuals they call “conspiracy theorists” and “science deniers” are not some little fringe group of weirdos and hillbillies as they may think of. The truth is we are big in number and consist of many dazzling minds and powerful members in our private fields of knowledge. This is no ragtag band of ne’er do wells.
Although I have no concern we are on the RIGHT side of things, I will say that to individuals who need to deal with us– that reality is of no genuine repercussion (being ideal appears to have to affect on them). It appears the sheep love to overlook us, and act as if we don’t exist, no matter the truth we are right. They can’t be troubled with us; we are only a problem to them. That mindset is going to one day bite them truly hard in the you understand where.
Numerous sheep have asked me, “How can you be sure you are right and we are incorrect?” I have often asked myself the same concern. There are lots of answers, my favorite is simply to say, “we are right since we are ideal”– which of course is rather flippant. This, nevertheless, seems to be a more prudent answer: Shrews wonder and look hard for answers.
Even if the prevailing consensus appears right, we constantly seem to desire more. We want to really understand why things are like they are. Maybe we don’t do this with whatever we experience; we definitely do it when dealing with big sweeping declarations and when the powers that be inform us we all have to “do” this or that, like take a vaccine nobody has truly studied for an infection that no one actually knows that much about. We typically go “huh?”
We then dive into it. We go down every bunny hole we can find. A number of those holes lead to dead ends, however we discover those dead ends for ourselves. We do not let anyone bar us from gain access to and state, “you do not want to decrease there.” We state, “huh? Why not?” When we start to feel that our typical sources for info, usually what they call “Main Stream Media,” is not giving us the whole story, we quickly move into some uncharted territory and begin digging there. Yes, once again, more dead ends but we become familiar with “dead ends” being foregone conclusion of really uninhibited discovery.
We create conclusions, assumptions, speculations constructed on all the information we have actually collected, and start to come up with something we can make a tenable statement of truth about. But it takes a lots of work. And is generally never ever final, never ironclad. We don’t appear to like things that “appear” ironclad.
Sheep do not do this.
I have not yet satisfied one that does. They frequently THINK they do, and throw back to me lines they have heard on NPR, or the WP or NYT, or obviously the huge “authorities” such as the retired Tsar of Science Fauci, POTUS, heads of major health centers or pharmaceutical business, et al. They do not appear to realize their insistence on these sources being precise belongs to aiming to Goebbels to verify the accuracy of a Hitler speech, or describing Der Stürmer for the fact about Jews. You require, today, to go to a variety of sources before you will come across a precise representation of social or scientific truth.
Sheep contradict this.
What is odd about this is that we have actually never ever remained in a culture where the mainstream news is 100% reliable. Sources have constantly been biased, and to really get a real picture of something, we have actually constantly needed to access several sources.
The problem is that as Americans (or Canadians for that matter) it has been drilled into us that liberty, truth, mom and apple pie are the trademarks of our American culture. Although the majority of us have been raised to believe that, it actually never has actually been the truth. Possibly for a millisecond it was back in 1776, but I doubt it. (The tenets here are true, but being told that these are the trademarks and intentions of the American or Canadian federal government is not the reality.)
That doesn’t always mean that this culture has actually been 100% deprived of any integrity for 200 years (well, today you might be able to state that) it suggests we have actually constantly been independently accountable for translucenting this wall of subterfuge. Regrettably I believe they finally handled to chop off the chicken’s head. Many people out there appear to have actually lost the capacity to utilize their brains.
It didn’t utilized to take all that much to reveal the boll weevils hiding in the cotton. We had completing papers that enjoyed revealing untruths in a competitor’s pages. This tended to work well with all but the greatest gamers (Rockefellers, Carnegies, Morgans, and so on), now it doesn’t operate at all because all the huge news sources are purchased. This is pretty obvious, however most sheep-types seem to believe an owner of a news source has no power over what they print.
Numerous envision some stogie smoking workaholic editor holding onto his anchor of fact saying with disgust, “they’re not going to stop ME from printing THAT.” I don’t believe that ever truly existed. I believe if anything kept older news sources more truthful than today, it was stumbling onto “truth” as a marketable product. This no longer seems to be the case.
So what does this pertain to a sheep deadly error? Well, simply that, truth is no longer a valuable product with major news sources, so we must all look to sources where it still is. Sheep don’t understand that shrews have reality on their side. And they line up with reality. They also do not believe we have integrity, or that there are quite a few of us, which we are very clever, resourceful, and consistent. Eventually that is going to get them, and in a very tough method.
Reality resembles water on a roofing system. It will discover its way through if there is a method through. Where that analogy stops working is when a roofing system becomes watertight. Culture and human society can never ever become “truthtight.” Do not ask me why, it is just a provided. Eventually reality finds its way in, no matter what. It might take a while, however truth will make it through. It will prevail.
Shrews may not all understand all the reality at any given minute, however they try to find it, no matter where it may be hiding, and they find it. When they discover it, and show other individuals where it is, they are expanding the hole for more of it to come through, similar to the leak in the roof, or the hole in the dam. Ultimately the dam will break and the roofing system will cave in.
Todd Hayen is a signed up psychotherapist practicing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He holds a PhD in depth psychiatric therapy and an MA in Consciousness Research Studies. He concentrates on Jungian, stereotypical, psychology. Todd also writes for his own substack, which you can check out here
For direct-transfer bank information click here.