Why did Fox News fire Tucker Carlson? Some claim that Tucker had actually planned to leave the network all along, and merely resigned. He had even had a studio built in his own home. He was fed up with Fox and chose to call it quits, so the story goes. However this theory is belied by the reality that Tucker’s production group was taken completely by surprise by the news. For example, I received the following text message from Scooter Downey, a manufacturer of Tucker Carlson Originals, in reaction to my inquiry after the statement: “No idea what’s going on. Crazy!”
Bill O’Reilly, who hosted The O’Reilly Factor, which appeared in the same time slot as Tucker Carlson Tonight, mentioned that Tucker and his personnel were blind-sided by the choice. “They were assembling tonight’s, Monday night’s program,” O’Reilly declared. “They were actively involved with making the rundown as everyone do who go on tv each night to speak to you. In the middle of that, boom. Tucker Carlson is history at the Fox News show. That’s how fast it came.”
The other significant description provided for Tucker’s separation from Fox has to do with the settlement of the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit. But the fit was filed in March of 2021 and Tucker wasn’t dismissed up until April 24, 2023. Rule demanded $1.6 billion and settled for $787.5 million. Tucker’s termination from Fox was not a condition of the settlement. On the other hand, as Megyn Kelly pointed out, Tucker was not even among the promoters on Fox of the theory that elections had actually been rigged using Dominion. “He was not a factor for that 800-million settlement,” says Kelly.
Even more, Tucker’s show was no doubt a leading money-maker for the network, or a significant methods for paying the damages. Why would Fox get rid of an income generator like Tucker Carlson simply as the bill came due? The answer is that Fox is not as concerned about earning money as it is about being a devoted servant of the program.
Tucker crossed considerable facility redlines and has actually lastly suffered the consequences. He consistently argued that the judgment elite hates the bulk and consistently attacks it, that national sovereignty is being worn down, and that the electorate is being changed. The redlines included his criticism of Volodymyr Zelensky and the U.S. participation in the Ukrainian war, his criticism of the covid reactions that ruined the economy, his questioning of the vaccines, and his targeting by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for numerous “offenses.”
In February, BlackRock Inc. increased its position in Fox Corporation (FOXA). BlackRock now owns 15.1 percent of the business. BlackRock’s enhanced position in Fox Corporation discusses, in part, the Tucker dismissal, and it was a termination, not Tucker’s choice.
Why would BlackRock, headed by CEO Larry Fink, pressure Fox News to axe Tucker? For one, Tucker was understood for his scathing criticism of Ukraine’s corruption, which put him at chances with the investment giant. In January, Carlson reacted derisively to a video of Ukrainian President Zelensky thanking BlackRock, J.P. Morgan, and Goldman Sachs for “rebuilding” the country. Tucker described Zelensky, not as a hero, as the establishment would have it, but as a totalitarian. Carlson has also been important of BlackRock’s push for ecological, social, and governance (ESG) investing, declaring, appropriately, that ESG is a way of preventing legislation and thus overturning democratic procedures. ESG thwarts the will of individuals and sets up a “climate modification” dictatorship in its place.
BlackRock likewise has massive holdings in pharmaceuticals companies, as one of the three biggest shareholders of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck. And Tucker just recently interviewed Robert Kennedy, Jr.. A presidential candidate, Kennedy has berated the covid-19 vaccines as “fatal and useless.”
Maybe most significant was the ADL’s calls for Tucker’s removal. Tucker consistently declared that the Democratic Celebration is attempting to change the American electorate with prohibited immigrants and the ADL called for Tucker to be de-platformed for holding to “the Great Replacement Theory,” along with other views that the ADL forbids. The ADL had actually regularly promoted Tucker’s dismissal. On The Megyn Kelly Program, after Kelly noted that the ADL was as soon as again promoting Tucker’s firing, Tucker said, “fuck them.” And Tucker struck back at the ADL on his own program.
Following Tucker’s dismissal, the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt celebrated Tucker’s firing on Twitter, where he also implicated Tucker of gushing “antisemitic, racist, xenophobic and anti-LGBTQ hate to millions.” He also acknowledged that the ADL had “long called for his shooting”:
It has to do with time. For far too long, Tucker Carlson has actually utilized his primetime show to gush antisemitic, racist, xenophobic and anti-LGBTQ hate to millions. @ADL has actually long required his shooting for this and lots of other offenses, consisting of spreading out the Great Replacement Theory.
The Rule defamation match was not the incentive for the elimination of Tucker Carlson from the Fox News line-up. Nor did Tucker go out of Fox on his own accord. Tucker was axed by the regime’s henchmen, who interact to silence dissent, maul the population with unlimited propaganda, and gaslight their victims with lies that represent the accurate inverse of the truth. As a propaganda device of the ruling class, Fox News is not mainly interested in profit. Its raison d’ĂȘtre is to act as controlled opposition. And Tucker was out of the facility’s control.
“The media,” Tucker recently stated, “are part of the control device … not just are they part of the problem, however I invested most of my life being part of the problem, protecting the Iraq War, like I really did that.” That is, Tucker concerned acknowledge that the media are ideological state devices whose functions are to indoctrinate, deceive, and support the reigning program and their narratives, whether past, present, or future. Tucker tried to overturn those media functions and ended up being a threat to the regime. It is no wonder that he no longer works for Fox News. The question is how he lasted so long.