If individuals who torture animals are psychopaths, then what are federal government officials who utilize taxpayer dollars to fund animal abuse? Numerous are asking this question in the wake of discoveries that the National Institute of Allergic Reaction and Infectious Illness, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci– high priest of the COVID cult– financed medical “research study” including the abuse of pups. This led “Fire Fauci” to trend on Twitter, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) to call for his resignation.
The puppy torture story was followed by disclosures that the federal government funded the screening of experimental help vaccines on orphans. Many of the orphans utilized as human guinea pigs consequently died, and nurses who helped in these experiments reported that lots of children got sick right away after getting the vaccines.
Checking harmful drugs on orphans and torturing puppies in the name of “science” is definitely stunning, however is it really surprising that federal government would money these kinds of activities? What is the distinction in between utilizing orphans and young puppies for vicious experiments in the name of protecting public health and eliminating innocent children in drone attacks in the name of stopping terrorism?
Ironically, these revelations come when Congress is on the verge of enabling the federal bureaucracy to destroy what remains of our medical personal privacy. Both the Senate and Home variations of the Labor, Education, and Health and Human Providers Appropriations expense get rid of the restriction on the advancement of a “distinct patient identifier.”
The restriction on financing for the special patient identifier, which I sponsored, has actually been in location considering that 1998. The push to permit the government to require every American to acquire an unique client identifier is being validated as a method to effectively keep track of Americans’ “contact and immunization” status.
When I started battling the distinct patient ID in the 1990s, my challengers rejected that medical identifiers would make it difficult to make sure privacy of medical records. Now, they are stating we must support medical identifiers due to the fact that they permit federal government authorities, employers, schools, airline companies, and even shops and restaurants to find what, if any, vaccinations or other medical treatments we have or have not received. The result of the identifier will be a medical caste system, where those who refuse to follow the mandates or advice of the “experts” are rejected opportunities to work, receive an education, or perhaps go to church or enjoy a night out on the town.
A distinct client identifier will compromise health care by making people reluctant to share personal details– such as alcohol and drug usage and past sexual history– with health care providers. It will likewise prevent sick people from seeking healthcare for worry their physicians will find they are unvaccinated, smoke, are obese, or participate in other unapproved habits.
A distinct medical ID could also be tied to government records of gun purchases. Somebody with “too many” guns could be labeled a possible mental health danger and harassed by police. This is especially likely if the gun grabbers succeed in their push to enact “warning” laws in every state.
Fortunately, there is a growing resistance to vaccines and other requireds. This resistance is not likely to passively accept a federally-issued distinct patient identifier. If those of us who know the fact take advantage of the opportunity provided by the resistance to COVID tyranny, we can not only stop the scheme to require every American to get a “distinct patient identifier” but end all government control of our healthcare.
Reprinted with authorization.