Col. Jessup: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I’m entitled to….
Col. Jessup: You want answers?
Kaffee: I WANT THE TRUTH!
Col. Jessup: YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!
Jeff Childers has written a post at his Coffee & Covid blog regarding the saga of James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas board: VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS – “truth conquers all things.” The points on which I will focus, which Childers examines in great detail:
From what I can tell, James is NOT just operating on instinct. I think he deliberately tested the theory of whether Project Veritas has been infiltrated, by asking the Project Veritas Board to resign. When every single traitorous one of them refused, James had his answer. It doesn’t MATTER whether it was Pfizer, the CIA, the FBI, Russia, Fauci, or even Putin himself. The company has been compromised.
From the time this story broke, in the back of my mind I kept thinking: How did such a board get in place? Important questions to be asked:
· What is the history of each board member (beyond and before their role at Project Veritas)?
o As Steve Bannon suggested, the board has a fiduciary duty to show us they don’t have any connection with Pfizer or anybody from Pfizer. Or, I will add, any other conflicted connection.
· When was each member brought on to the board?
o Per Charlie Kirk, some new board members were recently added.
· What are the procedures for approving new board members?
· Who, or what committee, nominates and approves board members?
o Who is on the committee?
· What are the terms of service for board members?
· Are the board’s actions consistent with the governing documents?
· Who was responsible and involved in setting up the governing documents?
In other words, how did such a board get put in place and get such control that they could remove the founder and motive force behind the organization?
Further, there are allegations of misappropriation of funds. What is the situation regarding the audit committee of the board and the annual audit of the financial statements – to include the necessary federal filings?
Finally, how much of the financial support comes from what percentage of the donor base? If the concentration is high (therefore, leverage), who are the major donors and what is their background and history?
These kinds of questions should be asked and answered. Many of these questions can be answered by gaining access to the organizing documents, minutes of board meetings, etc. As Project Veritas is a donor-supported organization, I believe the donors have standing to ask. Much of this might also already be publicly available.
Conclusion
All aspects of corporate governance and authority must be addressed and investigated in this situation. As you all know, investigating current news stories is not my strong suit. I usually blunder on such things. But I know the questions to ask, and I know there are many people out there really good at figuring out how to answer such questions.
There are many angles to this story. I have focused on one. But I think the answers to these questions will shed light on the many other aspects.