International Male: There has actually been a recent push by some United States politicians of the neocon range to utilize the United States military versus Mexican drug cartels.
Senator Lindsay Graham has actually proposed designating them as “terrorist companies.”
Representative Dan Crenshaw introduced a Permission for Use of Military Force (AUMF) to target drug cartels inside Mexico.
What’s your take on this?
Doug Casey: That’s simply what the US needs: another war, and this one on the border.
The people who back using military force in Mexico can only be referred to as senseless warmongers with no grasp of either ethics or history. If the war against companies like the Taliban in Afghanistan was a first-rate catastrophe, would an invasion exercise better in Mexico, which has three times the population of Afghanistan, is much richer and better organized? And they’re right on the border, which is really asking for difficulty.
The service to the drug cartel problem is to legislate all drugs. The reality is that anyone who desires drugs today can get them easily, even if they’re in high-security prisons. From a practical perspective, making drugs illegal does not work. All it does is greatly increase the cost of the drugs in the US and develop substantial profit margins to import them. Even if you destroyed every cartel in Mexico, individuals that want drugs will still desire them. As long as drugs are illegal, their costs will remain high and brand-new cartels will develop.
But in spite of the relaxation of penalties on marijuana, it’s extremely not likely drugs will be legalized. The DEA, among the most corrupt Federal firms, is a permanent lobby to keep them prohibited. And there’s method, way too much money in keeping them prohibited.
The only service is to find out a lesson from Restriction in the 1930s. When they illegalized alcohol in the 1920s, it produced the profits that allowed the Mafia to grow. It definitely didn’t cut down the quantity of drinking; it simply increased the amount of crime. Likewise, the crazy War on Drugs is responsible for the success of the cartels.
They say fentanyl, an important medical drug, kills 50,000 to 100,000 Americans each year. That’s primarily since its quantity and quality doubt, a repercussion of its illegality. But the genuine concern is ethical: Does government have a right to “secure” people against themselves? My answer is: No. If people like it, it’s their body and their service. Prohibition of alcohol– which is also rather a harmful drug– was expensive, destructive, unethical, and stupid. Fentanyl, the current bete noirof busybodies, is no different.
If drugs were as quickly readily available as aspirins through pharmacies, users would understand what they were getting, and people who want them could get them at a low-cost cost in recognized dosages.
Apart from acknowledging that you can’t protect people from themselves, it’s important to look at the root of why many people get lost in drugs. The answer, I believe, is that they’re attempting to conceal from truth and blot it out. Why is that? It’s a topic for another conversation. But the impracticality and browbeating brought on by State intervention in personal lives become part of the response.
International Man: Mexican President Obrador has stated he will not permit the US federal government or military to get in Mexican area.
It’s also popular that Mexican cartels have a substantial existence inside the United States.
Suppose the United States federal government sends out the military into action in Mexico anyways.
What do you think could take place?
Doug Casey: It certainly wouldn’t be the very first time that the United States has actually attacked Mexico.
In the 1840s, the US essentially took all the territory in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, from Mexico. I know you shouldn’t state that– it sounds unpatriotic. But patriotism needs to be concentrated on American worths, not necessarily on supporting the actions of political leaders in Washington.
In the Marine Corp’s hymn, one of the lines is “From the Halls of Montezuma” due to the fact that United States forces were in fact combating in Mexico City.
It occurred more just recently when during the Mexican Transformation in the 1910s, Pancho Rental property raided across the Rio Grande, and General Pershing’s troops crossed into Mexico to (unsuccessfully) pursue him.
There’s lots of precedent for Americans invading Mexico, however possibly the shoe is on the other foot now. 20 million or more Mexicans live in the United States, mainly in the Southwest. Believe it or not, many of them discuss a Reconquista.
It doubts what result it will have on the United States border if warmongers like the smarmy and silly little Lindsey Graham prosper in fomenting an invasion of Mexico. It might become a counterinvasion, an active shooting war needlessly produced to quash the Mexican drug organization. Which– insofar as it’s even a genuine issue– is a United States issue.
International Guy: No matter what occurs with the United States military in Mexico, the circumstance at the border remains a mess.
What do you think should be done?
Doug Casey: The violence of the cartels is said to be among the incentives for migration to the US. There appear to be at least a couple of million individuals– nobody has the precise number– yearly migrating from Mexico and other places into the US. Once they get here, numerous become wards of the large United States welfare system. It’s a problem.
The service, similar to numerous social ills, is strict observance of home rights. That implies the border needs to be safeguarded. Why? The migrants typically cross the privately owned land of Americans; they have no right to trespass. Even when the land is owned by the federal or state federal government, they have no right to trespass. It’s a question of strictly imposing property rights.
There’s an indication that often appears out west, “If you’re found here at night, you’ll be discovered here in the early morning.” It’s a justified sentiment.
Getting in the US, or, more significantly, onto any person’s private property without consent, is a major offense. Property rights are the basis of all rights.
It’s hard to understand precisely, but I think a significant destination to migrants is that they know that once in the country, they’re essentially guaranteed free food, healthcare, schools, housing, and numerous other kinds of well-being. That draws in the incorrect sort of individuals. The immigrants of the 19th century were also broke but got absolutely nothing when they pertained to the US. Now migrants get great deals of giveaways. Part of the answer is to eliminate any and all types of well-being both for Americans and immigrants– along with rigorous enforcement of home rights.
International Male: Distinguished patterns forecaster Gerald Celente has stated, “When all else stops working, they take you to war.”
Do you concur?
Doug Casey: Gerald is absolutely correct.
Taking a look at America’s war history, when the US battled Germany and Japan, those nations were changed due to the fact that they were totally flattened, devastated, and dispirited– that made it simple to reform them in the image that the US government wanted.
In the Korean War, which was really a war combated versus China on Korean territory, the United States dropped more bombs than in all of World War II. The country was absolutely flattened, and South Korea likewise changed itself in the image that we desired.
But Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and for that matter, Vietnam, were more on the order of sport wars against primitive countries. They were all embarrassing disasters.
What sort of war are we looking at with Mexico?
Will Washington flatten the country in order to change its government? I question whether the Mexicans will accept that. Or will Washington get associated with a protracted guerrilla war where drug gangs are designated as terrorists? Randolph Bourne was right when he stated: “War is the health of the State.” Unfortunately, the average American seems to have actually lost the power of vital thinking. He robotically corresponds the health of the State with the health of America.
In any case, it’s a bad concept for America. But Washington isn’t America. The Deep State will, nevertheless, discover someone to fight. Unfortunately, it appears like Russia and China are next on the dance card, although they might definitely add Mexico to the naughty list while more bankrupting and damaging the United States.
International Male: The United States federal government is ending up being more desperate and reckless every day.
How can the typical individual protect themselves and make money from this circumstance?
Doug Casey: The US government is significantly designating any genuine or envisioned enemy du jour— whether they’re Mexican drug cartels, the Russians, foreign separatist motions, or different American people– as terrorists. When somebody is termed a terrorist, the gloves are off, and it ends up being possible to devote any kind of criminal offense to combat him.
As the US destabilizes in numerous ways, Washington is discovering its genuine threat lies within the nation. What we’re taking a look at is a war of the US federal government versus many and different groups, as well as dissident specific citizens. The FBI, CIA, DEA, and other praetorian agencies are being changed into domestic secret police.
One way to safeguard yourself from this is to abandon the facilities until it ends up being safe to reside in the US once again.
Let me highlight the importance of having a second residency or a 2nd citizenship in case the United States enters the instructions of many nations in the past. And it’s not simply the US. Lots of apparently totally free Western countries are ending up being rather repressive.
In fact, it’s dangerous being a United States person in the US these days, at least if you speak out too loudly. It certainly worries me personally. Despite the fact that I do not believe it’s possible to change the course of occasions, I say what I do since it’s right, not due to the fact that it’s smart.
That said, you must plan on the United States federal government ending up being much more virulent in the future. Washington, not Mexican cartels, is the real threat.
That’s absolutely the case for the next 2 years, while authentic Jacobins control the government. But maybe beyond that. There’s no telling who’s going to be chosen or what they’re going to do. Since we’re likely going to be in the middle of a huge monetary, economic, political, social, and military crisis, anything is possible. Little of it is great.
The trend in motion is probably going to stay in motion.
Editor’s Note: It’s clear there are some threatening social, political, cultural, and financial trends playing out today. Much of which appear to point to a regrettable decrease of the West.
That’s precisely why legendary speculator Doug Casey and his group simply released this totally free report, which reveals you exactly what’s occurring and what you can do about it. Click on this link to download it now.