Will we see biotechnology serve the interests of humanity under a multipolar paradigm that cherishes nationwide sovereignty, human life, household, and faith? As much as it may cause us a fair offer of displeasure and even an indigestion to consider such ideas as the hold eugenics has on our currently struggling age, I think that ignoring such a subject actually does no one any favors in the long run.
This is especially major, as leading World Economic Online forum darlings like Yuval Harari flaunt such principles as “the brand-new global useless class” which Expert system, genetic engineering, automation and the 4th Industrial Revolution is apparently ushering in. Other Davos creatures like Klaus Schwab call openlyfor a microchipped worldwide citizenry capable of interfacing with a global web with a single idea while Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg promote ‘neuralinks’ to “keep humanity relevant” by merging with computer systems in a new date of evolutionary biology.
Leading Darwinian geneticists like Sir James Watsonand Sir Richard Dawkinsfreely protect eugenics while a technocracy consolidates itself in a governing station utilizing a “Fantastic Reset” as a reason to usher in a brand-new post-nation state period.
If there is something fundamentally wicked prowling behind these procedures which has any connection to the Anglo-American rise of fascism and eugenics nearly a century ago, then let’s a minimum of have the courage to explore that possibility. It wanted all, only by taking a look at this ugliness 80 years back, that patriots were able to take proper measures to avoid a lenders’ technocratic dictatorship in 1933and once again during WW2. so possibly a similar display of nerve to think the unimaginable might be worth the effort for those who may discover themselves in a similar scenario today.
What Didn’t Take Place at Nuremburg?
Seventy-six years ago, as the allies were combining their victory over the Nazi device and as the “Nuremburg Tribunals” were rapidly being set up, a new strategy was set into motion by the extremely exact same forces that had actually put large energy, cash and resources into the increase of fascism as “the wonder service” of post-WWI financial chaos that had actually spread across Europe and the U.S.A..
It is amongst the greatest scandals of our age that the Wall Street- City of London maker that financed Hitler and Mussolini as battering rams for a new world orderwere never ever in fact taken to court.
Although Franklin Roosevelt managed to put a leash on Wall Street between 1933-1945, while setting the world phase for a beautiful post-war vision of win-win cooperation, the darker forces of the investor oligarchy who wanted just to establish a global unipolar system of governance not just avoided punishment, however squandered no time at all to regain their lost hegemony prior to the war had actually come to a close.
The Function of Sir Julian Huxley
One of the conceptual grand strategists of this procedure was a guy named Julian Sorrel Huxley(1887-1975). Celebrated as a biologist, and social reformer, Julian was a devout life-long member of the British Eugenics Society serving alongside John Maynard Keynes as secretary and later on as its president.
Julian was a hectic guy, who along with his bro Aldous, strove to fill the very large shoes of their grandfather Thomas (aka: Darwin’s bulldog). While at the same time managing the post-WW2 eugenics movement, Julian discovered himself setting into motion the modern-day environmental motion as creator of the International Union for the Preservation of Nature in 1948, co-founding the World Wildlife Fund in 1961, created the term “transhumanism” and likewise establishing a tremendously prominent United Nations body called UNESCO (abbreviated for the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization) in 1946 which he ran as Director General from 1946-1948.
The required for the new company was set out clearly in Huxley’s 1946 UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Approach:
The ethical for UNESCO is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never ever be wholly understood through the means assigned to it- education, science and culture. It needs to envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single world federal government or otherwise, as the only certain ways of preventing war … in its academic program it can stress the ultimate need for a world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from different countries to a world organization.”
To what end would this “world political unity” be intended? A number of pages later, Huxley’s vision is set out in all of its twisted detail:
At the minute, it is likely that the indirect result of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic, and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, psychological instability and disease proneness, which already exist in the human types will prove undue a burden for real development to be achieved. Therefore even though it is quite real that any extreme eugenic policy will be for several years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the general public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unimaginable may at least become conceivable.”
After the world got the possibility to see what a eugenics program looked like under the complete support of a fascist social engineer, it would be no exaggeration to state that it lost a bargain of popularity in the eyes of a world population still quite connected to standard cultural organizations like Christianity, patriotism and regard for sacredness of life.
Although thirty U.S. Statesand 2 Canadian provinceshad actually legislated eugenics policies (including forced sterilization of the unfit) between 1907-1945, the statistical science and political application of eugenics ground to a shrieking halt by the end of World War 2 and as Huxley repeated in his manifesto, something new needed to be done.
< img src= "https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/eugenics-tree.jpg?x51581"alt=""width=
“530”height=”414″/ > A Word on Tavistock Huxley also worked very carefully with London’s Tavistock Center that got financing from both Rockefeller and Macy Foundations throughout the 1930s-1950s.
Led by a psychiatrist named Brigadier General John Rawlings Rees, Tavistock can be best comprehended as the “psychiatric branch of the British Empire” developed in 1921 which innovated psychiatric methods using mixtures of Pavlovian behaviorism and Freudian theories to affect group behavior in a variety of methods.
Early on, the center explored the extreme psychological conditions of shell shock victims who suffered cases of mental deconstruction throughout the terrors of trench warfare recognizing the high degree of malleability in these topics. As laid out by a brilliant 1996 EIR report by L. Wolfe, the idea behind Tavistock’s was constantly driven by an objective to determine how the brain may be “depatterned” and deconstructed in order to be reconstructed once again like a blank slate with the hopes that this insight into people may be replicated later on among broader social groups, and even entire countries. Much of this research was applied in the type of MK Ultra within the U.S.A. and will be the subject of a future report.
G. Brock Chisholm: Tavistockian Czar of World Health
One prominent psychiatrist who invested years dealing with Rees at Tavistock was a Canadian named G. Brock Chisolm.
In 1948, Chistolm established a UN-affiliated body called the World Health Company (WHO)with the objective of promoting psychological and physical health of the world. A worthy undertaking bring much obligation and power needing a leader with extraordinary insight into the nature of sickness and health. Unfortunately, based upon his own sick views of the nature of humanity and society, Chisholm was definitely the wrong man for the job.
Amongst the best causes of war and psychological illness in Chisholm’s mind were not to be found in imperialism or economic oppression, but rather in society’s belief in right and wrong. Writing in 1946 Chisholm laid out the function of “excellent” psychiatric therapy and education expression: “the reinterpretation and eventual elimination of the idea of right and wrong which has been the basis of kid training, the replacement of intelligent and reasonable thinking for faith in the certainties of old people- these are the belated objectives of virtually all effective psychiatric therapy”.
However it wasn’t simply the “idea of right and incorrect” or “faith in the certainties of old people” which had to be gotten rid of, but monotheistic faith, family, and patriotism. Speaking eight years later, Chisholm said: “To attain world federal government, it is required to get rid of from the minds of males their individualism, commitment to household custom, national patriotism and religious dogmas”.
The World Goes Mental
As soon as UNESCO and the WHO were firmly in location, a third organization was created to drive the financing, and the practice of global psychological health.
As detailed by historian Anton Chaitkin, moneyed primarily by the Macy Structure, the World Federation of Mental Health (WFMH) was produced in 1948. The Macy Structure itself which was created in 1930 under the leadership of General Marlborough Churchill (cousin to Winston) who had supervised of covert military intelligence from 1919-1929 in the form of the “Black Chamber“. His brand-new structure was a part of the Rockefeller machine and utilized as a conduit to put money into “health sciences” with a focus on eugenics.
The United States technical organizer to the conference that produced the WFMH made the new organization’s origins plainly understood. Nina Ridnour wrote “the World Federation for Mental Health … had been produced upon the suggestion of the United Nations World Health Organization and UNESCO because they required a non-governmental mental health company with which they could work together.”
And simply who would become the very first Director General of the WFMH?
While still serving as the head of London’s Tavistock Clinic, Brigadier General John Rawlings Rees was put in charge of the new body by none aside from arch-racist Montagu Norman (head of the Bank of England) who had actually developed the operation out of his National Association for Mental Health lack his London Thorpe Lodge home.
Explaining this strategic fight strategy to reform society, Rees stated:
If we prepare to come out into the open and to assault the social and nationwide problems of our day, then we need to have the shock troops, and these can not be offered by psychiatry based completely in organizations. We must have mobile teams of psychiatrists who are free to walk around and reach the local area.”
The idea of mobile groups of psychiatric shock troops was a concept advanced by leading grand strategist Lord Bertrand Russell who had actually composed in 1952’s “Effect of Science on Society”:
I believe the topic which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology … Its importance has actually been tremendously increased by the growth of modern approaches of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called “education.” Faith plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part … It might be hoped that in time anybody will have the ability to encourage anybody of anything if he can capture the patient young and is provided by the State with cash and devices.”
The Bi-Polar Cold War and a New International Paradigm
Over the occurring years, UNESCO, the WHO and WFMH worked in tandem to collaborate hundreds of prominent sub organizations, universities, research study labs, and concealed science including the CIA’s MK Ultrain order to produce the preferred “mentally healthy” society cleansed of its connections to Christianity, faith in truthfulness, nationwide patriotism or family.
By 1971, the world was ripe for a big change.
The infant boomer targets of this large social engineering experiment had actually been swamped by a huge arsenal of cultural warfare on every level. While LSD was spread out throughout schools of America, and assassinations of western leaders who resisted the new age of wars in Southwest Asia became the standard, the infant boomers viewed as their enjoyed ones returned from Vietnam in body bags. “Not trusting anyone over 30” ended up being the new wisdom as love of country was suffocated under the abnormal spread of Anglo-American imperialism abroad and COINTEL PRO-style operations at home.
When the CFR and Trilateral Commission unpegged the United States dollar from the gold reserve, a brand-new age of deregulation, consumerism and extreme materialism was ushered in causing the child boomer generation to quickly transmogrify into the 1980s hyper-materialist “me” generation.
On an ecological level, a new principles of “conservationism” had started to move from the fringes into the mainstream changing the former pro-industrial principles of the producer-creator society that had historically governed the best of western civilization.
Chief amongst the creators of this new preservation ethic which replaced the concept of “safeguarding humankind from empire” with “securing nature from mankind”, was none besides Julian Huxley himself. During the very same year that he co-founded the World Wildlife Structure, Huxley prepared the Morges Manifesto( 1961) as the organizing manifesto for the contemporary ecology movement pitting human civilization in plain contrast to the apparently closed, mathematical stability of nature.
Huxley co-founded the WWF with arch Malthusians Prince Philip “I wish to be reincarnated as a lethal virus” Mountbatten and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands.
Holdren’s Planetary Routine
By the mid-1970s, one of the leading neo-Malthusians of that age, Paul Ehrlich mentored a young protégé called John Holdren and together they produced a stomach-turning manual called Ecoscience in 1977where the pair composed:
Possibly those firms, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population companies, might become a Planetary Regime- sort of a global superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Program might control the advancement, administration, conservation, and circulation of natural resources, eco-friendly or non-renewable, a minimum of insofar as global implications exist.
Thus, the Program might have the power to control contamination not just in the environment and oceans, however also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international limits or that discharge into the oceans. The Program might likewise be a rational central firm for managing all global trade, maybe consisting of support from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the worldwide market.
The Planetary Routine may be provided duty for figuring out the maximum population for the world and for each area and for arbitrating different countries’ shares within their local limitations. Control of population size might remain the obligation of each government, however the Program would have some power to enforce the agreed limitations.
Thinking about that these words were composed just 3 years after Henry Kissinger’s NSSM-200 reportthat transformed U.S. foreign policy doctrine from pro-development to pro-population decrease, Holdren’s 1977 words ought to not be ignored.
The Human Genome Task Revives Sleeping Beasts
During the ensuing decades, Holdren ended up being close friends with a Harvard-based Rhodes Scholar and mathematician called Eric Lander who led the Human Genome Project from 1995-2002. Lander announced the success of the unveiling of the totally sequenced human genome in 2003 stating:
The Human Genome Job represents one of the exceptional achievements in the history of science. Its culmination this month signals the start of a new period in biomedical research. Biology is being changed into an info science”.
Discussing the potential for steering human evolution enabled by Lander’s Human Genome Task and the new developments in mRNA CRISPR innovation then unfolding, Sir Richard Dawkins composed in 2006:
IN THE 1920s and 1930s, scientists from both the political left and right would not have actually discovered the concept of designer children especially harmful– though of course they would not have actually utilized that phrase. Today, I believe that the concept is too unsafe for comfy conversation, and my guesswork is that Adolf Hitler is accountable for the change … I wonder whether, some 60 years after Hitler’s death, we might at least endeavor to ask what the moral difference is in between breeding for musical capability and forcing a child to take music lessons. Or why it is acceptable to train quick runners and high jumpers but not to breed them. I can think about some answers, and they are good ones, which would probably wind up persuading me. But hasn’t the time come when we should stop being scared even to put the question?”
It wasn’t long before Holdren discovered himself taking pleasure in higher power than he had actually ever pictured as science czar and designer of Obama’s “evidence-based” program of governance which involved optimizing funding for green tech to decarbonize humankind under brand-new systems of global governance. Lander worked carefully with Holdren as the co-chair of Obama’s science counciland likewise with Whitehead Institute President David Baltimore on the creation of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Together Lander and Baltimore supervised a significant 2015 conference on the “new age of biomedical research” that unveiled a brand-new gene adjustment technology called CRISPR involving the use of enzymes and RNA found in ecoli which were found to have the ability to target DNA sequences and induce various anomalies. While it is apparent that this powerful innovation offers prospective good to mankind as a tool to eliminate genetic illness in people and in crops, CRISPR’s amazing power to essentially change human DNA permanently can do inconceivable damage if taken into the wrong hands.
At the “historical” global top on human gene editingin December 2015, conference chairman David Baltimore echoed the scary words of Julian Huxley throughout his keynote speech: “throughout the years, the unthinkable has become possible. We’re on the cusp of a brand-new era in human history.”
In January 2021, John Holdren praised Erik Landerfor being selected Joe Biden’s Science Czar (Director of White House Science and Technology Policy)- the position previously held by Holdren.
In this position, Lander has managed the re-activation of every Obama-era science policy as part of a technocratic overhaul of the United States government in conformity with the World Economic Online forum’s Great Reset agenda. Using the huge power of the Emergency Permission Act to bypass the FDA and steamroll gene therapy technologies passing themselves off as “vaccines”, a new social experiment has begun.
CRISPR innovation is already being hailedas an essential to fixing the new mutating pressures of COVID-19 and is being utilized as a “vaccine” for certain tropical illnessas of this writing. The apparent connection in between eugenics companies of the other day and the increase of contemporary mRNA operations related to GAVI and Oxford’s Astra Zeneca revealed by investigative reporter Whitney Webbpreviously this year ought to be kept securely in mind.
Will this technology be used by modern-day heirs of Nazi-sponsoring eugenicists in an effort to pick up where Dr. Mengele left off OR will we see this biotechnology serve the interests of humanity under a multipolar paradigm that values national sovereignty, human life, household, and faith?
Future installations in this series will explore the eugenic roots of Transhumanism, Expert System, and the Great Reset. We will also take on the Frankfurt School, the rise of Wiener’s Cybernetics and the program detailed by Bertrand Russell and David Hilbert in 1900 to pack the whole universe into a stagnant dead cage.
This is part 1 of a 3 part series on the contemporary history of eugenics which originally appeared on Strategic Culture. Parts 2 and 3 will be released on OffG in the future, and are currently available here.
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review, Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Specialist on Tactical talk, and has actually authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Structure. This article was recently adjusted into a brief video found here.