Just yesterday we ran a story highlighting the unexpected shift in news coverage, far from Covid and towards HIV/AIDS.
In short, screening drives and federal government promises to “end the AIDS epidemic” accompanied news of a scary “new variant”. We will not information it all once again, you can read it here.
Our post reasoned that this was likely just a play to keep people scared, and offer a great deal of mRNA “vaccines”, and while that is absolutely an element, more research has actually revealed other possible angles to handle this story.
Whilst there’s not enough details to form any guaranteed conclusions there are some extremely fascinating concerns to be asked and theories to consider.
To start with, there’s the idea that the “frightening new help version” is not simply a phantom utilized to offer vaccines, as COVID has always appeared to be, but could actually be a cover for health problems and injuries triggered by the vaccines themselves.
A study in the Lancet in October 2021 claimed the Covid “vaccines” could result in what they called “VAIDS”, Vaccine Got Immune Shortage Syndrome. If this research is correct millions upon millions of individuals could end up being ill, and soon.
We have already seen a plethora of predictions of boosts in strokes and cardiac arrest, all credited to quite non-vaccine causes. Whatever from increased energy prices to lockdown-related anxiety has been blamed.
That certainly seems pre-emptive ass-covering behaviour. And this “new variant” of AIDS might be too.
If the Covid “vaccines” trigger millions of individuals to all of a sudden develop inefficient immune systems, a “more unsafe brand-new pressure of AIDS” is a respectable cover story, do not you think?
Again, there’s no direct evidence of this holding true yet, however it’s certainly possible.
In October 2020 one group of researchers, quoted in Forbes, warned that any prospective Covid “vaccine” could increase your threat of being infected with HIV.
Among the few abandoned Covid vaccine candidates, from the University of Queensland, in fact used a protein from HIV as a “molecular clamp” to bind their synthetic spike proteins together, the researchers declared. This prospective “vaccine” was obviously disposed of after test subjects returned “incorrect positives” on HIV tests.
I do not want to enter into the AIDS/HIV dispute here (or in the comments)– but whatever your position on that concern, you should yield there is something possibly quite odd going on here.
Another truth to consider: The death of Dr Luc Montagnier.
Dr Montaigner was a virologist who won a Nobel prize for his deal with HIV in 2008, repeatedly spoke out against the vaccines, and mentioned he believed the spike proteins show resemblances to HIV. And yesterday he died.
Now, he was 89 years old, and statistically, when you get to 89 you’re most likely to pass away than make it to 90, but it is an amusing piece of timing however.
It echoes the death of Dr Kary Mullis, Nobel prize-winning innovator of PCR, who passed away in late 2019, simply months before his innovation would be misused to sell a fake pandemic.
Funnily enough, I had actually composed 80% of this piece prior to I saw the most recent episode of New World Next Week, in which James Corbett and James Evan Pilato have a great discussion on this really topic:
OffGuardian’s position has always been that alarmism ought to be avoided until it is one hundred per cent justified, that “ah scary covid!” and “ah frightening vaccines!”, though seeming in dispute, can wind up servicing the same story.
This is true of the “vaccines can make new versions” line, for instance, which though appearing to be counter to the facility line, subtly strengthened it by keeping there was a definite disease called “covid”, and it postured a risk to the public.
However we also think in supplying all the information, and never ever dismissing any opinion or position if there’s some proof to back it up, and there are certainly questions to be asked on this issue.
There’s likely going to be big cash in HIV tests and AIDS “vaccines” in the future, however it’s possible there could be something even worse than that coming down the road. We’ll just have to wait and see.
However what do you people think?
- Is the new AIDS scare for real? Or another Covid counterfeit war?
- Could it be to cover up vaccine-related harms?
- If so, is this an intentional plan or an unexpected effect?
- Will they promote more screening? Why?
- Is “AIDS screening” a method of keeping track of a huge experiment?
Talk about in the remarks listed below.