The federal government’s migration policy is driven by service and economics, not by claims about “citizens of the world,” states Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL).
“This country has actually prioritized the importation of low-cost labor,” consisting of legal inexpensive labor, he stated in his book, entitled, “Years of Decadence: How Our Spoiled Elites Blew America’s Inheritance of Liberty, Security, and Success.”
Rubio continued:
Throughout this country today, the immigration system has been damaged and made use of. And it began, as many of America’s problems do, with the basic shift toward a globalized economy.
…
But not every business might be exported, which indicated Wall Street simply determined how to import inexpensive labor, much of it [explanation, not all] originating from unlawful immigrants. This was a slower, more subtle process. Sure, some politicians made a big offer about “jobs Americans wouldn’t do,” however otherwise the only outcry came from employees who discovered their earnings stalled, benefits cut, and hours slashed up until they could be changed by somebody ready to work more hours for less.
Generally, it is about jobs Wall Street does not desire Americans to do due to the fact that employing Americans would need higher incomes and much better working conditions. To them, it is better to import low-cost labor and purchase off Americans with cash well-being programs provided by the government.
Rubio’s book shows his long experience in immigration policies– specifically in 2013 and 2014 when he withdrew from the so-called “Gang of Eight” amnesty amid loud demands from many donors for more immigrant customers, workers, and occupants.
Rubio’s clear-eyed criticism of legal and illegal migration comes as numerous Americans acknowledge migration’s metastasizing damage to Americans’ wallets, kids, housing, health, innovation, society, and self-confidence.
In Rubio’s Florida, for instance, Gov. Ron DeSantis declared Might 10:
Nobody has a right to immigrate to this country. We identify as Americans what type of migration system benefits our nation, but when you’re doing immigration, it’s not for their advantage as foreigners, it’s for your benefit as Americans.
So if there’s legal migration that’s damaging Americans, we should not do that either. For instance, some of these H-1B visas, they would fire American tech employees and work with foreigners at lower wages. I do not agree with that. I think that’s incorrect.
“Illegal migration suggests theft of the American Dream … When you have 25M individuals who shouldn’t be here by law completing w/ American people to buy their very first house … That’s a significant issue we should be talking more about in the context of the immigration crisis”– @JDVance1 pic.twitter.com/Y929EabSnV– Andrew Surabian(@Surabees)February 9, 2023 Even the elitist Atlantic magazine published a June 2 post
spotlighting the link between investors and migration: [Federal policymakers state] labor is simply another product, like
wood or oil, and Americans are best off when it is plentiful and cheap … American public policy has actually largely managed to keep things that way
. Over the past 50 years, as both parties supported the entry of countless inexperienced immigrants and the offshoring of entire industries, America’s per capita gdp more than doubled after adjusting for inflation. Performance of labor increased by a similar quantity, and corporate earnings per capita nearly tripled. Yet over the same period, the typical inflation-adjusted hourly profits of the typical worker increased by less than 1 percent. This growing public hesitation is shredding the facility’s 1950s”Nation of Immigrants “narrative. For instance, a June 3-6 YouGov survey of 1,500 citizens asked, “In general, do you believe immigration makes the U.S. much better off or even worse off? “A 36 percent plurality of all participants stated immigration– legal and prohibited– makes the country”even worse off,”while simply 31 percent stated migration makes the nation”much better off.” Registered voters split 37 percent worse off
, and 35 percent much better off. This sea-change in popular opinion is colliding with the accelerated migration being pushed by President Joe Biden’s administration’s deputies, including his pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas. On December 13, for instance, Mayorkas informed ElPasoMatters.org: Our migration system as a whole is broken. It hasn’t been upgraded or reformed in more than 40 years. We look to our partner to the north that has a lot more active migration system that can be retooled to the requirements at the moment. For example, Canada is in requirement
of 1 million workers and they have actually concurred that in 2023, they will admit 1.4 million … immigrants to fill that labor require that Canadians themselves can not. We are stuck in old laws that do not meet our present needs.
area of New York City however is being afflicted by outdoor substance abuse, homelessness, death, crime, and more. I put this short Doc together so you can see what’s really happening in this part of New York City. This was put … pic.twitter.com/Kv1vxBII30– Viral News NY(@ViralNewsNYC)June 12, 2023 Biden and his deputies”are simply offering up on Americans, and figuring the immigrants will replace them because they’re in some way better,”Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Migration Researches, recently told Breitbart News.”It’s appalling and unethical.”