The Genocide Strikes Back

David Cole

April 04, 2023

Source: Bigstock That tranny genocide is something, huh?

It resembles the Yakov Smirnoff of genocides: “In Trannyland, genocide victims kill you!.

?.!! “In light of recently’s Christian school massacre, I wan na revisit something I composed a year ago concerning female impact in trannyism. I pointed out that “groomer” doesn’t describe why so many trannyism-in-school propagandists are women.

“Fanatics persuaded they’re saving the lives of children are damn challenging to defeat.”

What explains the female existence in the specifying mania of the 21st century?

The core belief of trannyists is that children are born genderless. Doctors make a guess– they “designate” a gender– and up until kids “find” their real gender (i.e., up until an adult leads them to it), they’ll be condemned to a life of torment and suicide.

This video game operates on the Scientology engine. Hubbard’s the template: We’re all born with “thetans” inside us, which’s why we’re dissatisfied. But Scientologists can pry the thetans out (for a cost). And after that we’ll be joyous!

Now, there was another mania that used the Scientology design template, and by studying that mania, we can respond to the question about ladies and trannyism: the 1980s child molestation panic (and the adjacent Hellish routine abuse panic).

For a lot of Americans today, that period is either a far-off memory or something that happened before their birth. At best, individuals understand the unclear details. There was a mass psychosis in the ’80s and early ’90s that caused instructors and day-care employees being wrongly charged with outlandish molestation criminal activities consisting of sacrificing kids to Satan and raping babies on altars.

The molestation/abuse panic was rooted in a “truth” that mirrors trannyism almost precisely. Your misery is brought on by the truth that you were molested as a child. This is cart/horse stuff. It’s not “I was molested for that reason I’m dissatisfied,” it’s “I feel dissatisfied for that reason I was molested.” Kids who broke down or out, who appeared distressed, unfortunate, sidetracked, or who did badly in school, must therefore be molestation victims. And it depended on kid psychologists, therapists, and behavioral experts to draw out the memories of that abuse.

As in trannyism, the mania was constructed around the “discovery” of (and blind belief in) an incorrect principle.

The trannyism trend: “An unhappy kid shows a kid who was assigned the wrong gender at birth and I need to suss out their true gender in order to save them.”

The molestation trend: “An unhappy kid indicates a kid who was molested and I should suss out the molestation in order to save them.”

Here’s where the trannyism and molestation fads deviate from the Scientology template: Scientology is all about cash. Trannyism and molestation mania are/were largely about mindless do-goodism.

But cash was however a factor for starting and sustaining the molestation panic. The 1974 Child Abuse Avoidance and Treatment Act doled out dough to the states on the condition that they established an infrastructure of abuse reporting. Starving for funds, states began one-upping each other in reporting “cases.” The more cases, the more money a state would receive (Florida went from sixteen reported cases in 1965 to 28,000 by 1975).

That’s how political leaders got included; there was cash in it. And much of that cash went toward paying “professionals.” Probably the 2 most egregious early charlatans were psychiatrist Roland Top and sociologist David Finkelhor. In the late ’70s, Summit “found” that children can not lie about abuse. It’s not physically possible. For that reason, as soon as you require an admission from the kid that they were abused, the child can not stroll it back (Summit, a quack extraordinaire, went so far as to state that if a kid says they weren’t molested, that’s evidence they were. It’s proof if they state yes, it’s evidence if they state no. And this became canon).

Essentially, a child couldn’t “detransition” from “molestation victim.” When the detective requires an admission of molestation by any ways needed, the kid’s confession can not be reclaimed. If your principle is that a kid can not lie, then you can not ever accept that a child lied.

Finkelhor helped leader the routine abuse scare. That was his offer.

So by the early ’80s, the rules had actually been developed:

( 1) Any kid with behavioral issues has actually been molested. Proof of molestation isn’t needed; the behavioral concerns are the evidence.

( 2) Force the molestation admission any method possible because untruths about molestation can not originate from a kid’s mouth, so as soon as you get the words out, your case is shown.

( 3) It’s not just private molesters at play however entire networks of ceremonial abusers.

Okay, so where do ladies can be found in? Well, the kid psychologist/child behaviorist field has actually always been female-heavy (even now it’s 70.5 percent female), so there’s that. But likewise, ladies (usually speaking) tend to consider themselves as “empaths,” and sussing out what’s in the heart of a kid (be it their “real gender” or their “concealed molestation”) is a job females naturally take to.

Plus, middle-class white females have actually always been suckers for the idea that there’s a “essential” to attaining a state of uniform, continuous joy; you just need to discover it. As feminist author Elayne Rapping observed in Social Policy in 1997, if not for women, the “recovery movement” never would’ve ended up being a billion-dollar market filled with gullible seekers of “perfect health.”

If you strike that white middle-class female demo with gimmicky crap like “The Secret” (the pseudoscience Oprah was pressing in the 2000s until it eliminated a couple of women), it resembles candy to them. “The trick” to treating children of unwellness is to discover their molestation experience. “The trick” to curing kids of unwellness is to discover their real gender.

However there was an issue, and this is why the molestation panic flamed out within a decade while the tranny fad won’t: The molestation panic pitted 2 female-dominated professions versus each other. Child psychologists/behaviorists vs. primary school teachers and day-care employees (80 percent female occupations). Of the innocent people apprehended in 1980s/90s molestation panics, the majority of were teachers/day-care employees, and numerous were females.

Drove the teachers’ union insane! If you read articles from that period, the instructors– collapsing under an onslaught of allegations and witch trials– seem like parents today grumbling about tranny propaganda. “The kids are being brainwashed! Even if they say something’s ‘their truth’ does not indicate it’s true! The kids are succumbing to a fad; their good friends say they have actually been molested, so they do too! The media’s feeding the craze! The kids are confused; it’s the job of grownups to remedy them, not indulge them!”

The tranny fad will go on much longer since this time, the instructors and the kid psychologists/behaviorists are on the very same side, unified versus parents. Teachers and diminishes (mainly women) sussing out the “secret gender” of kids (to save them! To free them!) as parents and households pay the price, everybody having actually easily forgotten that simply 35 years ago the shrinks were the ones doing the sussing and the teachers were the ones paying the rate.

The molestation mania of the ’80s was led by people shrieking “die groomer!” (or words of the time to that degree), and today’s trannymania is being fought by individuals who believe screaming “pass away groomer!” is the treatment. However by taking a look at the outsize role of ladies in both pathologies, it ends up being clear that there’s far more at play than “grooming.” Male trannies are easy to determine: They’re normally autogynephiliacs. With them it’s sexual. But it’s not sexual with the female supporters. They see themselves as rescuers of children, simply as they did during the molestation panic. That makes them more dangerous. The men just wan na beat off while using a dress as someone calls them ma’am. The females possess a rescuer complex. Enthusiasts convinced they’re saving the lives of children are damn hard to defeat.

One need to understand the psychology behind the fanaticism. Which is a high order for conservatives, due to the fact that thoughtful contemplation isn’t always their thing.

Which is why I’ll close by examining the “Satan” element of the panic. This is something you likely have an in reverse understanding of. The “hellish panic” did not come from the religious right. It came from the left. As the hack psychologists and therapists were pulling molestation confessions from kids, rewarding them for each new awful detail they “kept in mind,” the kids started comprising stories that mirrored the scary films of the time. Devils, demons, blood-drinking. As British anthropologist Jean La Fontaine pointed out in 2001, children being coerced into admitting molestation in the early ’80s invoked Exorcist imagery, while those in the early ’90s invoked Hannibal Lecter.

This is why so many of the day-care facilities charged with hellish abuse were church-based. The more religious training the kids had– the more their minds had actually been filled with devil imagery– the more supernatural their “confessions.”

Nowadays we think of the hellish panic as a rightist venture, but it was the opposite: It was a leftist endeavor that mainly took advantage of Christians.

Ellen Bass and Laura Davis, leftists whose now-discredited book The Courage to Heal helped open the hellish panic floodgates, explained their work as “a progressive movement to redress the rights of the disenfranchised and oppressed.” Roland Top himself called his work “progressive.” A 1985 WaPo short article cheered the crusade against “satanic routine abusers” by framing it as a fight in between the heros (“psychologists, television manufacturers, federal bureaucrats, authorities, social workers, chosen officials and sexual reformers”) vs. the bad men (“ministers, priests, instructors, day-care employees, and scoutmasters”).

That WaPo piece slammed conservative Christians for trying to stop the panic. That’s why it’s so paradoxical that today the common belief is that conservative Christians started it. Indeed, this incorrect history is now accepted unquestioningly by “experts” in the field (author Richard Beck, whose 2015 best-seller about the 1980s panic received a well-deserved drubbing in the NY Times for pinning the blame on conservatives) and– again, paradoxically– by today’s rightists, who, manipulable as always, react to leftists stating, “You started the hellish panic,” by doing the knee-jerk oppositional defiance shtick, “You wager we did! And we stand by it, too!”

From Cerno (or was it Poso? Yeah, it was Cerno) promoting a go back to the panic due to the fact that “scary motion pictures, metal, hip-hop, and secular music open demonic websites,” to alt-right screecher Neema Parvini (a.k.a. OGRolandRat a.k.a. Academic Agent) burping that “every rightwing ethical panic for the past 300 years were justified INCLUDING the Satanic Panic of the 1980s,” rightists take the bait since of course they do.

But, in fact, you know the biggest powerhouse behind the 1980s satanic panic?

The Tavistock Institute. Valerie Sinason, psychoanalyst/psychotherapist at Tavistock, was maybe the most prominent promulgator of satanic ritual abuse hysteria.

Yes, that’s the same Tavistock Institute behind the tranny fad; the same Tavistock that had its gender clinic forcibly nearby the NHS last year for butchering and chemically castrating children in the name of trannyism.

Tavistock introduced that gender clinic in 1989. They laid the groundwork for the tranny fad simply as they ‘d previously laid the groundwork for the hellish panic.

And here we come cycle, a direct line leading from one trend to another via the exact same institute and the very same Ph.D. ‘d madmen and madwomen moving from one mania to another, bringing misery to the world in the name of saving children.

If you simply wan na shout “groomer,” you’ll miss out on the big picture. You’ll discover yourself not able to describe the role of eggheads, quacks, and ladies in the tranny crusade, and as a result, you’ll find yourself at a loss relating to how to oppose it.

It’s merely the leftist-birthed satanic molestation panic redux, way more hazardous this time because old competitors are now allies.

And while I have no magic bullet to take down the beast, I can at least inform you what will not help.

A stubborn lack of knowledge of the nuances and history of the pathology won’t assist.

Persistent ignorance never assists anything, however in a battle this existential, if there were ever a time to drop the inexpensive sloganeering and jump into the weeds with a scythe, it’s now.

About the author

Click here to add a comment

Leave a comment: