In every nation where a transformation has occurred (whether it be a “soft” revolution or a violent topple), those who are part of the winning team make a point of glorifying the transformation and all the “excellent” that it has actually brought. For this reason, the residents of a lot of countries where a revolution has happened at some time in their history will think that the revolution was positive. In countries where that revolution was opposed, the people will probably regard the transformation as unfavorable.
As an example, Frenchmen tend to applaud their Revolution of 1789, in which the upper class were toppled. Ever since, the emphasis has been on the “little man.” The little man would not only be treated similarly to the aristocrat, he would receive preferential treatment. Not surprisingly, this degenerated into the socialism that dominates France today. In spite of the dysfunctionality of the French system, the majority of Frenchmen fondly praise the Transformation and the “freedom” that it ostensibly created for them.
And then we have the Cuban Revolution of 1959. Its mentioned purpose was to overthrow the aristocratic Batista Routine and change it with one that favoured the campesinos. The aristocracy was eliminated and ownership of most everything transferred to the state. There is most certainly greater equality in Cuba today (albeit at an extremely low level), and yet we’re taught to relate to the Cuban Transformation as having been damaging, as it devolved into socialism. Although the existing system is largely inefficient, the Cuban people, even today, speak of the freedom that the Revolution produced for them.
These two examples are similar, and yet Westerners are taught to concern the French federal government as an informed body of men and women who invest their waking hours legislating for ever-increased goodness for the French people, yet we’re similarly taught to relate to the Cuban federal government as oppressive rulers lording over an oppressed people.
The understanding of the outcomes of the particular transformations would seem to have little to do with the factor for the transformation, its instant outcome, or its eventual outcome, and have more to do with whether the management of the country is “on our side” or not. Those nations where the leaders align themselves with our own nation are good and enlightened, whilst the leaders who do not align themselves with our nation are oppressive dictators. The real level of freedom for individuals is not truly at concern.
“We’re Not Going to Take it Anymore”
So let’s take a thumbnail view of revolutions. The property behind the desire for revolution is always the same– a section of the population feels that the federal government (and really perhaps their mates) have become oppressive and must be toppled. When the history is written by the victors, they will endeavour to develop the impression that the whole population rose; however, this is never the case. A discontented minority succeeded in taking control of.
So what, then, of the majority? Well, prior to the revolution, they sat along the sidelines and endured whatever viewed injustices the previous government imposed upon them. Throughout the transformation, they frequently sat on the sidelines, wishing to have as little participation as possible, and, after the revolution, they generally sat on the sidelines, wishing to take advantage of the new routine, or a minimum of prevent being victimised.
In Russia in 1917, a reasonably little number of individuals toppled the upper class and were then faced with the problem of taking over. They had no experience in this and didn’t understand where to start. Get In Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin, who had little to do with the revolution itself but, through funding from London and New York banks, were able to pay the Russian military and cops to develop order, to a cursory degree. When this was accomplished, they used the military and authorities to develop order to a ruthless degree. (Not precisely conserving the little guy from the injustice of the aristocracy.) As Mister Lenin himself said,
“One man with a weapon can control one hundred without one.”
In the aforementioned France in 1789, the aristocracy was overthrown by a relatively small number of revolutionaries, and, once again, the victors had no real experience in running a nation. Enter Maximilien Robespierre, a legal representative with a style for control and a contempt for the hoi polloi. However, he was good at rhetoric, and the people cheered as he lopped off heads. This in spite of the fact that he most definitely did not deliver “liberty” to the French people, just the impression of it. As he himself specified,
“The trick of freedom depends on informing individuals, whereas the trick of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant.”
And so it has actually gone, in one transformation after another. Whether it be a soft revolution, or a violent one, it’s normally followed by a disorganised and typically violent duration, where commerce, social stability, and liberty suffer, at the minimum, for as long as it takes the new management to pull it all together, and, for the most part, long afterwards. From Juan Perón in Argentina, the Shah in Iran, Hugo Chávez in Venezuela, and many others, revolution has actually suggested decreased liberty and tough economic times.
Meet the New Boss– Even Worse Than the Old Boss
In some cases, such as Mao Tse-tung in China, Idi Amin Dada in Uganda, and Pol Pot in Cambodia, conditions worsened substantially after the transformation had actually “freed individuals”– sometimes for decades.
It must be stated that there have been a couple of cases of both soft and violent revolutions in which the new leaders were truly visionary and ushered in an era of greater freedom, such as the American Revolution of 1776, Corazon Aquino in the Philippines, and Nelson Mandela in South Africa. Yet, even in these cases, the rot set in practically instantly through individuals within the new governments who looked for to recreate authoritarian power within an otherwise positive takeover.
Be Careful What You Long for
The American Transformation regardless of, violent transformation nearly never ever ends well. The chances are bad that you’ll get a more just leader or the higher freedoms that the revolutionaries have actually promised.
Today we’re observing the wear and tear of the world’s most prominent capitalistic nations, all at the very same time. Each has degenerated into a fascist state. Once again, to price quote Mister Lenin,
“Fascism is capitalism in decrease.”
Rather so. And, like many Russians in the early days of the twentieth century, we see an increasing variety of citizens of the previous “free world” realising that the decline of their nations is baked in the cake… that things are not likely to enhance in their lifetimes.
Therefore, many fantasise that a revolution of some sort will take place. They expect a soft transformation (virtually no possibility of that happening) or a violent one– potentially generated by the millions of weapon owners throughout the country. Regrettably, no amount of pistols and assault weapons will equal their government’s arsenal of tanks, drones, chemical weapons, etc. A revolt could happen, and spontaneous nationwide guerrilla strategies might make it tough to put down, however the likely result would be years of strife and bloodshed, followed by considerably increased authoritarian guideline.
A 3rd choice might be to accept that, yes, the decrease into fascism is a dead end, however then so, in all possibility, is revolution. That holding true, those who see 2 possible negative outcomes and no positive one might take the easier action of internationalising– relocating to one of the numerous nations that are not currently on the ropes.
Editor’s Note: Regrettably, the majority of people have no concept what truly takes place when a government goes out of control, not to mention how to prepare …
The coming economic and political collapse is going to be much even worse, much longer, and extremely different than what we have actually seen in the past.
That’s precisely why New York City Times best-selling author Doug Casey and his team just launched an urgent guide that will show you precisely how to prepare. Click here to download the PDF now.