Covid isn’t just a matter of personal health, but it is especially a raving matter of public health; but, if Americans do not care about the health of anybody but themselves, then what else can this be but an insane country?
On the one hand, America’s Supreme Court is so concerned about the alleged ‘right to life’ of non-conscious early-stage human fetuses as to determine to any lady in whose body such an object is being formed, “That is state property and you have no right to end it.” However, on the other hand, America’s public are so little worried about their own and actual “right to [mindful] life” as to permit (and to accept their Federal government’s permitting)– at a time of among the most dangerous and most intensely infectious pandemics in international history– unmasked people to mass together in crowds of strangers to captivate themselves therefore to catch the often lethal disease and pass it on to others (after the occasion), and they consequently produce vast numbers of completely preventable deaths throughout the entire U.S. population, in spite of America’s declared ‘right to life’. Americans, clearly, care more about safeguarding the lives of pre-conscious fetuses than about securing the lives of themselves and all of the strangers whom they meet– conscious beings. Is that sane?
On September 3rd, NPR’s Nina Totenberg headlined “The Supreme Court Heads Toward Reversing Abortion Rights”, and reported:
The Supreme Court’s conservative bulk tossed a legal bomb into the abortion dispute late Wednesday night.
By a vote of 5-to-4, the court’s most conservative members upheld, for now, a Texas law that, in impact, bans abortions after about six weeks. However almost as crucial as the outcome was how the court reached its choice– without full instruction and arguments before any court.
The court bulk, including its three Trump appointees, highlighted that it was not ruling on the concerns provided in the event. Still, it refused to block the law from entering into result for procedural reasons. The unsigned court order was simply one long paragraph in length. And within a day, state lawmakers in Florida and elsewhere announced plans to introduce copycat legislation in their states.
Chief Justice John Roberts, who has actually dissented from nearly every choice supporting expansive abortion rights, disagreed this time. He called the Texas law unprecedented due to the fact that it not only bans abortions after roughly 6 weeks, however delegates enforcement powers not to state authorities but to the general “population at big.” Roberts kept in mind that the law seems deliberately structured to avoid courts from having the ability to without delay think about the constitutionality of the law. …
Particularly, the law confers on any private the right to submit suit for cash damages versus a center, or anyone who aids or abets an abortion after a fetal heart beat is found.
This is now the Trump Court; and, whereas, formerly, signed 5-to-4 conservative U.S. Supreme Court rulings were common, this was an unsigned 5-to-4 theocratic judgment by all 5 of the U.S. Supreme Court’s fundamentalist Christians: four Roman Catholic fundamentalists (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh), and the only Protestant fundamentalist) (Barrett), ruling that the brand-new Texas law, which positions $10,000 bounties on the heads of anybody who participates or helps, or “intends” to, an abortion in Texas, ought to perhaps be allowed to be imposed by this bounty-system, and ought to momentarily be allowed to be enforced, though “this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law,” however the ruling rather welcomes all states to consider passing similar laws so that the U.S. Supreme Court itself possibly won’t require to act in order to disallow abortions, and thus this matter may just go back to being a state rather of federal matter. Interestingly, the billionaires-controlled U.S. ‘news’-media report, and generally praise, details of each of the two (signed) dissenting opinions, however not of the one (and much more essential however unsigned) five theocrats’ majority decision, so that the general public will not comprehend what’s occurring (which that bulk decision is preparing to enforce).
Amongst the extremely few public commentaries on that majority (5-to-4) choice was one by the lawyer Luppe Luppen, who headlined “The Supreme Court Guts Roe and Opens a New Age of Nullification”, and he summed up by saying “If state legislatures can successfully shut off constitutionally secured rights by creating or copying treatments that flummox these five Justices, they may well try to do it.” He pointed out the legal mayhem which that will cause. However, his presumption, there, that the 5 theocrats were simply “flummoxed,” rather of carrying out a really systematic and thoroughly thought-out pro-theocracy repair of the coathanger-abortion period in America, wasn’t backed by him citing any proof, due to the fact that it is merely incorrect. These theocratic ‘Justices’ are appreciated by the public, though they are carrying out the commands in the Bible, rather of in the U.S. Constitution, and it’s achieved by their own, and by the ‘news’-media’s, deceits, and, particularly, by ‘news’-media declining to call lies “lies.” Though, throughout Trump’s Presidency, Democratic Celebration ‘news’-media were starting to call his lies “lies,” none of the American media call lies “lies” normally. For instance, Obama’s large serial-lying is still typically neglected, instead of noted.
As regards Americans being “so little concerned about their own and real right-to-life regarding permit (and to accept their Federal government’s enabling)– at a time of one of the deadliest and most intensely communicable pandemics in global history– unmasked individuals to mass together in crowds,” RT headlined on September 5th, “‘Not a mask in sight’: Fans return to U.S. college football in a BIG method– to the delight of many, but the horror of others (VIDEO)”, and posted many pictures of huge crowd-scenes of Americans at sporting events and other entertainments, in which nobody was using a mask. Covid isn’t just a matter of private health, however it is specifically a raving matter of public health; however, if Americans don’t care about the health of anybody however themselves, and if they are dumb adequate to believe that by going to such occasions they are not endangering both themselves and others, then what else can this be however a ridiculous country, where such dangerous behavior is legal? It might be typical for many countries– France, for example– but still it is, rather merely, outrageous.
Is insanity typical? Is it great? Or is it bad? Exists any doubt about that?