Ukraine Is a Sacrificial Pawn on the Imperial Chessboard

By Caitlin JOHNSTONE

The war is not going wellfor Kyiv, and it would be unreasonableto expect that to alter. As a greatly exceptional military force overwhelms the US customer state, reality remains in the procedure of crashing down hard in the face of western liberals who bought into the war propagandathat the brave, attractive comicwas leading an upset triumph to kick Putin’s ass out of Ukraine.

Zelensky is now raving at NATO powersfor refusing to step in militarily versus Russia, apparently having actually previously been provided the impression that the US-centralized empire may risk its really existence protecting its dear buddies the Ukrainians from an invasion.

“Sadly, today there is a total impression that it is time to give a funeral repast for something else: security warranties and promises, decision of alliances, values that appear to be dead for somebody,” Zelensky said Friday.

“All the people who will die beginning with this day will also pass away due to the fact that of you,” Ukraine’s president included. “Due to the fact that of your weakness, due to the fact that of your disunity.”

It must be hard, the process of discovering that you were never ever in fact a valued partner in western civilization’s fight for freedom and democracy. That you were always simply one more sacrificial pawn on the royal chessboard.

In a brand-new short article titled “U.S. and allies quietly prepare for a Ukrainian government-in-exile and a long revolt“, The Washington Post reports that US authorities prepare for Russia will reverse its early losses and effectively drive the Zelensky routine out of the country, after which “a long, bloody insurgency” is planned versus the intruders backed by billions of dollars in US financing.

The United States has a history of working to draw Moscow into gruelling, expensive military quagmires which monopolize its military firepower while seeping it of blood and treasure. Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, author of United States hegemonic manifesto The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, honestly bragged about having enticed Russia into its own Vietnamcombating the US-backed mujahideen in Afghanistan for a decade.

Simply two years ago then-US Special Agent for Syria engagement stated throughout a video eventhosted by the Hudson Institute that his task was to make Syria “a quagmire for the Russians”.

So this isn’t something new or out of the blue, and what it suggests is that all the self-righteous posturing by the western political/media class about the need to pour weapons into Ukraine is not actually about conserving Ukrainian lives (just working out a ceasefire can do that), however about taking this golden opportunity to injure Russia’s geostrategic interests as much as possible. Ukraine on its own is powerless to stop Russia from taking Kyiv no matter how many weapons are sent, however those weapons can be used to combat a “long, bloody insurgency” after that occurs which costs a lot more lives, keeps Moscow militarily preoccupied and hemorrhaging money, and eventually harms Putin’s appeal at home.

This by itself would do a lot to advance United States interests, however on top of that you’ve got the even greater advantage of manufacturing global permission for extraordinary acts of economic warfareversus the entire country of Russia, along with killing Nord Stream 2and rallying tremendous assistance for NATO and the imperial military/intelligence maker. The western world is now a joined front versus the Sauron-like menace of Vladimir Putin in similar way it joined against the risk of global terrorism after 9/11, and we’re most likely only seeing the beginnings of the agendas this will be utilized to present.

We can expect these programs to be utilized in an effort to impoverish, undermine, agitate, and eventually collapse and balkanize Russia, as the CIAand Washington overload monstershave wished to do because the fall of the Soviet Union. This would leave China standing alone without its nuclear superpower guard bearand much more susceptible to imperial operations tailored towards warding off the emergence of a true multipolar world, an objective United States imperialists have actually had in composing for 3 decades.

That’s a great deal of potential advantage to the US empire just for losing Ukraine. Type of like sacrificing a pawn to get the queen in chess.

I believe a huge part of why I and others incorrectly undervalued the possibility of a major intrusion of Ukraine was that the cost-to-benefit math never made good sense; on paper Moscow stands so much more to lose by this action in the long term than it stood to get. There was likewise a little bit of a presumption that the empire would rather Russia not take Ukraine, choosing to gradually encroach with NATO salami slicing techniquesthan give up a helpful customer state on Russia’s border, and would change its actions appropriately.

However chess is everything about out-maneuvering your challenger to leave them nothing however bad alternatives to select from, and in the end leaving the king without any safe moves. The drivers of empire would have understood that, as the late Justin Raimondo discussed all the method back in 2014 for Antiwar, Putin might not pay for to lose Ukraine to the west without losing important assistance in Russia. Integrate that with increased attacks on Donbas separatistsand the west’s adamant refusal to make the most worthless concessions like guaranteeing they wouldn’t include a country to NATO who they had no objective of adding anyhow, and you can understand if not support Putin’s drastic strategy.

About the author

Click here to add a comment

Leave a comment: