When Force Satisfies Power: The Inevitable Collapse of the New World Order

Ryan Matters

When the famous quantum theorist, David Bohm, read Jiddu Krishnamurti’s” The First and Last Liberty”, he was blown away by his insight and knowledge regarding the phenomenon of the observer and the observed. Despite having no university-level training, much less official education in the sciences, Krishnamurti had, through his philosophical writings, showed a profound understanding of different concepts related to quantum mechanics.

Krishnamurti, an Indian author, thinker and speaker, was, at an early age, taken in by the Theosophical Societyand groomed to end up being the brand-new World Instructor. Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater, the leaders of the Theosophical society at the time, nurtured Krishnamurti at their headquarters in Madras.

They, along with a couple of select associates, carried out the job of educating him, guiding him through mystical mentors and typically ‘preparing’ him to end up being the car for ‘Lord Maitreya’, a highly progressed spiritual being dedicated to assisting the development of humanity.

However, when it came time to ‘unveil’ Krishnamurti to the world as a fantastic teacher and leader of mankind, Krishnamurti broke all ties with the theosophists, denounced all arranged belief, knocked the idea of masters (and the entire teacher-follower relationship), and devoted himself rather to the pursuit of liberty for both himself and humankind at big.

By the time Bohm had actually checked out “The First and Last Liberty”, Krishnamurti’s teachings had actually established beyond the point of theosophical influence. Bohm recognized that Krishnamurti’s insights were shown in his own operate in quantum theory and felt it urgent to consult with him as soon as possible. Ultimately, the 2 of them did satisfy face-to-face in London where they exchanged concepts and participated in abundant discussion.

Bohm explained his first conference with Krishnamurtias follows:

I was struck by the terrific ease of communication with him, which was enabled by the extreme energy with which he listened and by the liberty from self-protective bookings and barriers with which he reacted to what I had to state.”

Bohm recognized his conference with Krishnamurti as a conference of minds not unlike that which he felt when talking to other researchers. In truth, he even compared Krishnamurti to Albert Einstein, mentioning that the 2 of them “revealed a comparable intensity and lack of barrier”.

Bohm and Krishnamurti met each time they remained in London and penetrated deeply into the nature of time, space and mind. The 2 of them would undoubtedly strike on the topic of awareness and this is where Krishnamurti’s insights shined.

Certainly, Bohm felt that Krishnamurti’s most effective mentors were those interested in the general disorder and confusion that pervades the consciousness of humanity, for it was he who used not just a description of this issue but a solution to it.

Krishnamurti preserved that all this condition, which he felt was the source of such extensive grief and torment, and which prevented people from enjoying one another, had its roots in the reality that we are ignorant of the general nature of our own processes of idea.

In other words, Krishnamurti observed that while we are generally knowledgeable about the contentof our ideas, we are hopelessly oblivious as to the originand procedureof believing itself.

This ignorance, which triggers condition within guy’s awareness, is revealed outwardly as the disorder we see within society itself– war, widespread sorrow, violence, segregation, et cetera.

But why should this hold true?

The response, maybe, depends on Bohm’s area of competence– quantum physics. As Heisenberg’s unpredictability principle teaches us, you can not properly measure both the position and momentum of an item and, for that reason, our apparently “strong” reality is shown to be non-determinable [#notes”>1]

And as the experiments of the brilliant Dr. William Tiller program, a conscious observer might “flex reality to his will” by holding a concentrated intent, the impact of which can be quantified and even amplified if that intent is held by several individuals at the very same time.

William A. Tiller, a physicist at Stanford University devoted over four years of his life to investigating the impacts of human intent on the homes of materials and what we call physical reality. His researchfound that it is possible to effect a considerable modification to the residential or commercial properties of physical products simply by holding a clear intent to do so.

Interestingly, Tiller and his coworkers also discovered that it is possible to imprint or “shop” an intent within an electronic device, which would then have the exact same effect on an item as that of a human awareness holding the exact same objective. Tiller’s outcomes have been regularly recreated all over the world.

Bohm himself proposed a holographic design of deep space based upon enfolded and unfolded states of being originating from a typical source beyond both the unmanifest and manifest worlds.

His scientific insight echoes the view of truth experienced by enlightened sages throughout the centuries. In Vedanta, the manifest world is called “Maya”, indicating “illusory reality” and it emanates from “Brahman”, the universal sea of limitless prospective [#notes”>2]

It is therefore simple to see why Bohm was so taken by Krishnamurti’s mentors. The ancient teaching of “as above, so below” or man as a microcosm is embodied within the curious quantum “observer effect” that ties awareness to the “outside” world and the really fabric of space-time itself [#notes”>3]

Once this phenomenon is understood as being genuine, it is not tough to see how and why disorder within can develop condition without.

The response, then, to guy’s issues lies in understanding the process of thought. And this, according to Krishnamurti, requires meditation. Though by meditation, Krishnamurti does not mean we ought to sit on a rock in the lotus position, no, Krishnamurti’s idea of meditation is centred around the root significance of the word itself.

The English word ‘meditation’ is based on the Latin root, “med” indicating to measure. The Sanskrit word for meditation, “dhyana”, relates to “dhyati”, meaning to reflect. Putting these together brings us closer to Krishnamurti’s meaning of meditation which is to consider and show while focusing one’s attention on what is really going on.

Krishnamurti maintained that the act of meditation itself was enough to bring order to the activity of idea, for “in the seeing is the doing”. In this state, the mind becomes quiet, energy boosts and something brand-new and imaginative starts to unfold. This, according to Krishnamurti, is extraordinarily significant to the entire of life.

As soon as again we can discover a physics parallel to describe what Krishnamurti is saying. A cluttered mind filled with arbitrary thoughts, desires, fears and anxieties, is akin to a high entropy system. Entropy is a measure of randomness or condition within a closed system and minimizes the energy readily available to do work.

“Work” in this case refers to the ability to effect modification within the physical medium, which as Tiller’s research programs is done through focusing one’s intent. In his illuminating three-part tome, physicist Tom Campbell broadens greatly on this concept, describing that, within a consciousness “system”, “high entropy” refers fear, while “low entropy” corresponds with love.

For that reason meditation, as defined by Krishnamurti, ends up being a tool to bring order to the activity of idea or “minimize the entropy of the system”. This naturally leads to greater energy to do work (i.e. a more concentrated intent and therefore a higher capability to effect modification “out there”).

The conclusion of this procedure is an increase in power. The source of this power stems from the idea that all men and women are developed equivalent. This is the extensive truth behind Krishnamurti’s assertion that “there is no authority, no teacher, no master and no saviour”. Each one of us is all of those things, and at the time, none at all. We are all capable and entitled to the awareness of Fact or God or whatever one may want to call it. Starting the course is a free choice choice.

Power supports life– it boosts, dignifies and sustains. It offers us energy and vitality. It is whole and complete, requiring nothing from outdoors. Power is associated with empathy, love and unity. Power promotes creativity, recovery and positive feelings. Power enables us to create positive modification in order to more totally reveal our cumulative divinity.

In the lack of power, modification should be effected through force.

Whereas power bases on its own, without the need to move versus anything, force constantly moves versus something. Force is fragmented and for that reason needs to be fed energy constantly. Force takes inwhereas power produces. While force needs sustained input, power acts without effort.

Newton’s 3rd law teaches us that force always develops counterforce and for that reason it is limited by definition. While force needs to resist opposition, power stands still. Power impacts change through its own field of impact, without the need to use up energy.

Force is associated with friction and conflict. This point is possibly best described by Dr. David Hawkins himself:

“Force always develops counterforce; its effect is to polarize rather than combine. Polarization constantly indicates dispute; its expense, for that reason, is constantly high. Due to the fact that force incites polarization, it inevitably produces a win/lose dichotomy; and since somebody always loses, opponents are created. Constantly faced with opponents, force requires consistent defense. Defensiveness is usually costly, whether in the market, politics, or worldwide affairs.”

Hawkins, R, D., 1995. Power vs Force. Hay House, Inc. 2012 reprint.

Thinking about the concept of power and force within the context of the present international crisis leads us toward some profound conclusions. For one, agendas that center around inequality, control, profit and product gain are always driven by force.

Force is a tool used by those who do not have power. When your motives break the good of humanity, when your intents stop working to support life itself, your only choice is to use force. Force includes all manner of fear-mongering, control, browbeating and violence. Force might work up to a point but as we found, it requires a continuous input of energy and therefore, outcomes are obtained at a cost. Propaganda campaigns need huge amounts of cash, coordination and determined censorship. Vaccine requireds need allurements, dangers, and the covering of unfavorable events.

This energy input is tremendous and, most significantly, unsustainable.

As force creates friction, it needs to continuously be fed with increasingly more energy. But as the force becomes more powerful, so does the friction. Force, due its polarizing nature, increases entropy. As entropy increases, the readily available energy reduces, till, ultimately, momentum stops and the entire thing grinds to a stop.

While the source of power is self-evident, indestructible and inarguable, force undergoes ‘proof’ and needs continuous reason. While true power emanates from awareness itself, force is driven by the ego.

Those who use force to enforce their will on humanity constantly succumb to power. As history has revealed, all totalitarian regimes ultimately come crashing down– not on account of some divine intervention, but due to the fact that each of us is born with inalienable rights that are intrinsic to human development.

For that reason, it is only a matter of time prior to the transhumanist force implodes. However, the time it takes for that to take place depends on our ability to lower condition and increase power. A lower entropy awareness suggests more energy available to do work which results in more power, liberty, joy and love. As our power collectively grows, we create an unmovable wall able to drive away any and all negative impacts and wicked dangers.

On the other hand, the ego-mind is continuously asking undeniable questions and stressing over unlikely futures. As our minds become cluttered with fear-laden media, our power decreases and we find ourselves at the mercy of “authorities”.

Bohm’s “holographic” universe hinted at the true nature of our reality and Krishnamurti revealed us how to understand it. By turning our attention far from the content of thought, and concentrating on the procedure of thinking itself, we can bring order to the mind and begin to discover something completely new.

In this method, we extricate ourselves from a state of worry and confusion and move towards flexibility and certitude. The outcome of this is a boost in power. Force is by meaning restricted in what it can achieve, and for that reason it is not a matter of if the transhumanists will fail, but when.

Ryan Matters is an author and free thinker from South Africa. After a life-altering duration of health problem, he started to question mainstream medication, science and the true meaning of what it is to be alive. A few of his writings can be found at newbraveworld.org, youcan also follow him on Twitter and Gab. RECOMMENDATIONS: [1] Keep in mind: The listed below quote is in recommendation to Heisenberg‘s’unpredictability concept’and Bohr’s’complementarity principle’:”These two essential principles have profound implications, not only for quantum physics, however also for our understandings of the nature of truth. One ramification is that the relatively strong trusted truth that we perceive is

based upon something that is eventually unsure or non-determinable. Numerous have discovered this to be a stunning ‘reality’. Einstein, for one, not only found it stunning however likewise tried to refute it, saying to Bohr one of in his many arguments with him that he(Einstein)could not think that God played dice with deep space. “– Jackson, P. Quantum physics and human awareness: The status of the existing argument, The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, Working Paper, November 2002. [2] Tom Campbell’s work is particularly practical in comprehending the clear connections between quantum physics, consciousness, and the apparently”physical “world within the context of a”virtual “reality mirroring the Eastern viewpoints and systems of idea, albeit put

into strictly clinical terms.”Wave-particle dualities, uncertainty principles, and the seemingly instant interaction between entangled pairs become easy to explain as soon as you realise that [physical reality] is a virtual reality developed by a digital simulation executing a space-time rule-set [

within a bigger awareness system] Offered a digital reality simulation, which is advance by time increments that appear infinitesimal to us, and a virtual truth that should follow just the rules driving its digital calculation, these paradoxes disappear together with the impression of absolute space. When the limiting belief that all possible reality is specifically specified by measurements within [our physical truth] is abandoned and the true nature of awareness is understood, the mysterious paradoxes of physics, approach, and metaphysics all melt away like ice cubes in the summer sun.”– Campbell, T. 2003. My Huge Toe: Discovery. Reserve 2 of a Trilogy Unifying Viewpoint, Physics and Metaphysics. [3] The observer plays a fundamental function in quantum mechanics, as the very act of observing some element of a quantum system modifies some other element of the exact same system. This implies a direct connection in between awareness and the “real world”.”In quantum mechanics …

Any interaction that is strong enough to measure some element of a system is always strong enough to disrupt some other aspect of

the same system. Therefore, you can find out absolutely nothing about a quantum system without altering something else.”– Susskind, L., Friedman, A., Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum. 2015. Penguin Random House UK.

About the author

Click here to add a comment

Leave a comment: