Hunter Biden exposed Thursday that President Joe Biden believes “whatever I do ought to remain in National Gallery” of Art, while Hunter works to sell “confidential” investors art work for $500,000.
“Mother and father and Melissa, who believe whatever I do need to be put in the National Gallery,” Hunter communicatedthe opinions of the presidential household on an art podcast.
“That’s what it’s about,” Hunter continued about reaching a broader audience. “Is to have the nerve to kinda head out there and do that, and, you understand, I could just remain my studio and paint for myself, and, ahhh, and, and, and I ultimately do that.”
“But it’s sort of, ummm, exciting to know that there’s audience, and for that audience to be able to have their own analysis of what your painting means to them,” he stated. “I believe it’s a great thing for an artist.”
HUNTER BIDEN, asked what he has to state to those questioning the rate of his art & raising concerns about buyers:
“Besides fuck ’em?” Biden tells @NFreeman1234 & @mrgodsill. “I ‘d be amazed if my art had sold for $10 … the rate is completely subjective” https://t.co/geSw3ySrpI
— Kenneth P. Vogel (@kenvogel) July 30, 2021
When Hunter was challenged regarding what he thought about those who condemn the practice of trading off his daddy’s name, he reacted by utilizing blasphemy.
“Fuck em … Look man,” Hunter Biden statedon the Nota Bene Podcast, “I never said my art was going to cost what it was going to cost, or how much it would be priced at. I would be astonished, you know, if my art was sold, for you know, for, umm, for 10 dollars.”
“Even if the very first time you ever tackle it is the concept that somebody is attracted to your art, not to mention they would pay something for it,” Hunter continued.
Hunter Biden’s art work negotiations have actually triggered Rep. Michael Waltz (R-FL) to present legislation Wednesday to block the “shameless grift” of selling “art” to “anonymous” financiers.
The legislation is “targeted at stopping the obvious and shameless grift that’s happening with Hunter Biden’s art sales, for which he is undoubtedly not certified to do and is only doing to continue to profit off of his household name,” Waltz mentioned.
Hunter recently strucka deal with art fanatic Georges Bergès to sell his art after arranging 2 art shows this fall.
Bergès has strong connections with China, which, by the way, occurredaround the time when President Joe Biden’s boy made deals with Chinese officials and made tens of countless dollars monthly serving on the board of Burisma in 2014.
“My plan is to be the lead man in China; the lead collector and art dealership discovering and supporting skill from that area,” Bergès said. “I plan to discover and find and give the rest of the world those I think about China’s next generation of modern-day artists.”
Bergès also declared in 2014 that he travels to Communist China “3 or four times a year” and that, at the time, he had a “solid group of about 25 collectors, the majority of them overseas.”
Bergès connections to Communist China are worrisome since of Hunter’s past workthroughout his father’s term as vice president– making offerswith Chinese officials and cashingin 10s of thousands of dollars per month serving on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian oligarch-owned oil and gas business, regardless of having no experience in the energy sector.
Joe Biden later flauntedhis ability to threaten to withhold help from Ukraine unless authorities fired the district attorney carrying out a corruption investigation into Burisma.
Problem Child. https://t.co/PqJZBdmD1s
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) July 23, 2021
But instead of making the transactions more transparent and available to examination, the Biden administration is intending to strike an offer to make buyers of Hunter Biden’s artwork, which is expected to cost up to half a million dollars, confidential.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki on July 22 labeledHunter’s meeting with possible “anonymous” art buyers “affordable.”
Breitbart News senior factor and Profiles in Corruptionauthor Peter Schweizer, nevertheless, toldBreitbart News the “anonymous” proposition as an absolutely “ridiculous” service to the President’s son generating income off the household name.
“The only way to deal with these problems is with higher transparency– not less,” Schweizer said. “Their proposed option is greater secrecy, not openness. And they are essentially saying ‘Trust Us.’ Joe and Hunter Biden’s performance history on such matters offers us no reason to trust them.”