UK Government Privately Believes Wuhan Lab Leakage Theory: Report

The British government independently believes that the Wuhan laboratory leak theory is the most likely origin of the Chinese coronavirus, a chemical and biological counter-terrorism consultant to the government has actually declared.

Though the belief that the COVID-19 infection emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology was as soon as classified as a conspiracy theory, Number 10 Downing Street apparently now privately accepts “behind closed doors” that it was most likely the case.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, the British broadsheet most carefully associated with the Tory Party-run government, previous British army officer Hamish de Bretton-Gordon said that “I believe the main view [within Government] is that it is as likely as anything else to have actually caused the pandemic. A lot of people like myself believe it is most likely. I think mindsets have changed a little bit.

“There is a huge quantity of concern about coming out openly, however behind closed doors the majority of people believe it’s a laboratory leak. And they are coming round to the truth that even if they don’t concur with that, they should accept it’s most likely, and they need to ensure the policies remain in place to stop it.”

Colonel de Bretton-Gordon, a leading expert in Britain on chemical and biological counter-terrorism, added that the “zoonotic transfer theory just didn’t make good sense,” describing the concept that the infection established within an animal prior to jumping to human beings.

He added: “My view, that I have actually put to the Federal government already, is that we can not manage mentally, physically or financially, to go through another pandemic. We should now get on the front foot.”

The recommendation of the laboratory leak theory was initially shut down in a letter in the prominent English medical journal The Lancet published in March of 2020. Some 27 researchers “strongly condemned conspiracy theories” such as the hypothesis that the Chinese infection dripped from the Wuhan laboratory.

The letter was organised by British zoologist Dr Peter Daszak, who later on confessed to having a dispute of interest as he functions as the president of the US-based EcoHealth Alliance. The NGO funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with money supplied from the Dr Anthony Fauci-run National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A reportfrom the Intercept found that the American federal government provided EcoHealth Alliance with $3.1 million in financing, consisting of $599,000 which went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study, in part, the ability to modify bat coronaviruses in order to make them more contagious to human beings, directly opposing sworn testimony from Dr Fauci, who declared that the U.S. did not fund gain of function research study in Wuhan.

Dr Daszak later served on the World Health Organization’s group of private investigators who examined the Wuhan laboratory and declared that there was “no proof” of a leak, despite confessing that his team basically had to take the word of researchers at the laboratory, as his team was not supplied with hard evidence that the virus did not exist in the lab prior to the pandemic.

A report from Republicans in the United States House of Representatives– which found that the “preponderance of proof” suggested a lab leak– claimed that Daszak had actually personally fulfilled the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s ‘Batwoman’ researcher Shi Zhengli in 2004 and had actually used American government grants to conduct gain of function research study on bat coronaviruses at the laboratory.

In September of in 2015, an investigation by The Telegraph declared that 26 out of the 27 researchers who signed the letter had disputes of interest as they were either tied to the Chinese lab or other researchers and funders tied to Wuhan. At the time of The Lancet letter’s publication, none of the signatories who knocked “conspiracy theories” declared a dispute of interest.

Though the remarks from Colonel De Bretton-Gordon represent one of the very first indications that the British government now presumably registers for the theory, prominent figures in the UK, such as previous MI6 director Sir Richard Dearlove have long promoted the concept.

As early as June of 2020, the former leader of Britain’s foreign secret intelligence service said that he thought– on the basis of research studies of the virus— that it had actually been “crafted” and for that reason was likely to have actually originated in the Wuhan lab.

Sir Richard argued at the time that therefore the government need to “reconsider how it treats its relationship with China and how the worldwide neighborhood behaves towards the Chinese leadership”.

Today, Prime Minister Boris Johnson acknowledged the risks posed by lab leakages, telling your house of Commons that the federal government’s biosecurity technique is being upgraded to get ready for the possibility of future “natural zoonosis and lab leaks”.

Colonel De Bretton-Gordon, who formerly worked as the leader of Britain’s Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Program, stated that biosurveillance systems and treaties on biological weapons require updating to avoid future pandemics.

“If you ‘d had detectors at stations and airports in Wuhan, you might have avoided about four million journeys because first week. With that type of system, you could stop a laboratory leak turning into an epidemic, turning into a pandemic.

“My huge concern is that next time it might not be an accident, since it’s easy to do. If you had no morals and no scruples, why not infect your opponent?”

Follow Kurt Zindulka on Twitter here @KurtZindulka

About the author

Click here to add a comment

Leave a comment: